International Strategy in Current Context
Rahul Jain
Guest Faculty, Pearl Academy of Fashion
During the last half of the twentieth century, many barriers to
international trade fell and a wave of firms began pursuing international
strategies to gain a competitive advantage. Strategies are the
means by which long-term objectives will be achieved. Business
strategies may include geographic expansion, diversification,
acquisition, product development, market penetration, retrenchment,
divestiture, liquidation, and joint venture.
Strategic management enables organizations to recognize and adapt
to change more readily; successfully adapting to change is the
key to survival and prosperity. Strategic-management concepts
provide an objective basis for allocating resources and for reducing
internal conflicts that can arise when subjectivity alone is the
basis for major decisions. In the current context there can be
two broad kind of international strategies:
1. A Global Strategy
Treat the world as a single market. It is applied where forces
for global integration are strong and force for national responsiveness
is weak. For example this is true of consumer electronics market.
2. A Multinational Strategy
It treats the world as a portfolio of national opportunities.
It is applied where forces for global integration are weak and
force for national responsiveness is strong. For example this
is true of branded packaged goods business for example strategy
pursued by Unilever.
Global Strategy
Marketing Power.com defines it as:
“A strategy that seeks competitive advantage with strategic
moves that are highly interdependent across countries. These moves
include most or all of the following: a standardized core product
that exploits or creates homogenous tastes or performance requirements,
significant participation in all major country markets to build
volume, a concentration of value-creating activities such as R&D
and manufacturing in a few countries, and a coherent competitive
strategy that pits the worldwide capabilities of the business
against the competition.”
Multinational or multidomestic strategy
It treats the world as a portfolio of national opportunities.
It is applied where forces for global integration are weak and
force for national responsiveness is strong.
Critical factors determining strategy are:
| |
Global Strategy |
Multi Domestic |
| Industry Structure WorldWide |
Uniform |
Huge Differences |
| Competition |
Globally |
Regional |
| Economies of Scale requirement |
High |
Low |
| Nature of Cost Curve |
Flat |
Relatively less flat |
| Customer needs |
Homogeneous |
Heterogeneous |
| Nature of Customer |
Global Size |
Small sized |
| Regional Culture |
Little Impact |
High Impact |
| Local Responsiveness |
Low |
High |
Thus Multi-domestic Strategy is suitable for:
- Product customized for each market
- Decentralized control - local decision making
- Effective when large differences exist between countries
- Advantages: product differentiation, local responsiveness,
minimized political risk, minimized exchange rate risk.
Global Strategy is suitable for:
- Product is the same in all countries.
- Centralized control - little decision-making authority on
the local level
- Effective when differences between countries are small
- Advantages: cost, coordinated activities, faster product development
Case of McDonalds
McDonalds is a good example of a company that followed a multidomestic
strategy. This strategy resulted in:
1. Local need is taken utmost care. Here the customer of each
nation will get according to their needs.
2. More autonomy to the subsidiary:
It enables individual subsidiaries of a multinational firm to
compete independently in different domestic markets.
3. Act as SBU:
Each subsidiary behaves like a strategic business unit that is
expected to contribute earnings and growth proportionate to the
market opportunity.
4. Innovation from local R&D:
For Example McDonald's put in eight years in India before its
first restaurant came up in 1996. At that point, the odds were
heavily loaded against it. For, it had already decided not to
launch its beef-based core product - the hamburger - in India
so that it didn't hurt religious sentiments of the Hindus. The
company knew that the key to its survival here lay in acceptance
by the government and the customer. It meant figuring out the
right menu -- substituting mutton for beef, something it has never
done in any other market, choosing names like McAloo or Maharaja
Mac, adding variations and dishes that don't appear in any other
McDonald's chain anywhere in the world. Finally, it meant getting
the pricing just right. The Maharaja Mac ensured that McDonald's
main offering was competitively priced. No wonder "McDonald's
has established itself as the family's favorite quick-service
restaurant.
Finally, it meant getting the pricing just right. The Maharaja
Mac ensured that McDonald's main offering was competitively priced.
No wonder "McDonald's has established itself as the family's
favorite quick-service restaurant," beams Amit Jatia, managing
director of Hardcastle Restaurants, the Mumbai Franchisee of McDonald's.
The KFC experience couldn't have been more different. It paid
enough attention to its main raw material supplies -- by working
with Venkateshwara Hatcheries for the right chicken. It also got
its cold chain in place. But then it slipped up by not paying
enough attention to the cultural context in which Indians consume
food. It offered too few choices -- with less than a dozen items
on the menu to start with compared with 35 at McDonald's. Larger
proportions of Indians are vegetarians, which meant a smaller
market. A smaller menu simply cut out a lot of potential consumers.
References
1.NO.1 FOOD SERVICES
MC
DONALD'S INDIA
2. Attachment: Win India
Think
India to win India, Kohli Vanita
With reports from Pallavi Bhattacharjee & Shuchi Bansal
3. See Annexure- I Overview of Globalization strategy of McDonald
4. R. Kerin, S.Hartley, E.Berkowitz, W. Rudelius: Marketing, eighth
edition, McGraw-Hill 2006
5. Kotler, Philip: Marketing Management: nineth edition, Prentice
Hall India
6. Schermehorn, J. R. (2005). Organizational Behavior (9th ed.).
Hoboken, NJ: Judy Joseph.
7. Pearce, J. and Robinson, R. (2004). Strategic Management: Formulation,
Implementation and Control. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies.
ANNEXURE-I
INTRODUCTION ON McDonalds
McDonald’s Corporation (NYSE: MCD) is the world's largest
chain of fast-food restaurants. Although McDonald's did not invent
the hamburger or fast food, its name has become nearly synonymous
with both.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McDonalds#Emblem_for_globalization
Emblem for globalization
McDonald's has become emblematic of globalization, sometimes
referred as The Mcdonaldization of society. The Economist magazine
uses the "Big Mac index" (the price of a Big Mac) as
an informal measure of purchasing power parity among world currencies.
McDonald's impact has garnered praise as well as criticism. Some
observers have suggested that many of its innovations have become
commonplace and are no longer seen as such, and that the company
should be given credit for increasing the standard of service
in markets it enters.
Restaurants around the world
McDonald has globalised by way of franchising through out the
globe. The northernmost McDonald's restaurant is located on the
Arctic Circle in Rovaniemi, Finland, while the southernmost franchise
is located in Invercargill, New Zealand. Also, the world's easternmost
McDonald's is located in New Zealand, in the city of Gisborne;
the westernmost restaurant is in Western Samoa, as they are the
closest to either side of the International date line.
McDonald in India
In India the Big Mac transmogrifies into the Maharaja Mac, a
mutton burger in deference to religious injunctions against the
consumption of beef and pork. Also in India vegetarian and meat
dishes are prepared in separate areas of the restaurant in respect
for vegetarians.
|